Back issues

Feature: Type: the influential Mr Lubalin

Creative Review

Is Herb Lubalin behind the current predilection for elaborately decorative typography? This autumn’s Lubalin Now show made the case for the designer’s enduring appeal

The use of decorative type, as so beauti­fully realised in work by the likes of Alex Trochut, Si Scott and Marian Bantjes, has been gathering momentum for some time, but seemed to reach critical mass over the past 12 months. What’s behind it all? One theory being advanced is the influence of Herb Lubalin, the American art director and designer who died in 1981.

Lubalin’s work has been made accessible to a new generation via showcases on websites such as Design & Typo (typogabor.com) and on various Flickr streams but, for the real thing, devotees head down to  the Cooper Union’s Herb Lubalin Study Center of Design and Typography in New York. The Study Center (founded in 1985 by the cu and friends of the designer) has a core collection that includes an extensive archive of Lubalin’s work dating from 1950–1980. In September, it moved to an extended space in the CU’s new building (more on this on our website).

Curator (and designer) Mike Essl marked the occasion in November by staging Lubalin Now, an exhibition of the work of 23 designers and typo­graphers who either directly reference the work of Lubalin, or, as he says, “share a kind of formal kinship” with the great man. “Over the last few years I began to notice an increased use of the Lubalin and Carnese typeface Avant Garde,” says Essl of the thinking behind the show. “I also became aware of the work of Justin Thomas Kay, a designer who freely references the work of Lubalin. From there the idea began to snowball as I continued to see references to Lubalin in advertisements, on television, and in design work  that I found on websites like fffound, Flickr, and Behance.”

Kay, who designed the logo­type for the exhibition and also has work in the show, says that he became interested in Lubalin in college. “I had a professor who saw my back­ground in illustration as well as my obsession with learning as much as I possibly could about working with type. He gave me a copy of the ‘blue Lubalin bible’ [Gertrude Snyder’s Herb Lubalin: Art Director, Graphic Designer and Typographer, published in 1985] and I became immediately enthralled with the way Lubalin made type speak as the main illustrated element in his work,” he says. “I love his ability to take chances in then-modern typographic convention for the sake of his own vision of what typo­graphy could be.”

Why is Lubalin such an influence today? Perhaps the answer lies in the origins of his work. Lubalin was reacting against the conformity of the 60s. In a famous essay in u&lc magazine in 1998, design writer Steven Heller wrote that “like the 60s itself, type was ready to explode off the page and into the popular culture” and Lubalin was the man to light the fuse. He was a rebel, a rulebreaker. Those today who are searching for an antidote to the watered down versions of Modernism that pass for ‘good design’ have found the perfect role model.

Lubalin Now, featuring the work of 23 contemporary designers along­side Lubalin originals, is at The Cooper Union, NYC, until Dec 8. lubalincenter.cooper.edu

2 Comments

At the end of 2008 I completed my research "paper" for my MFA at Marywood University. The result was a book titled 3 Decades, 3 Designers, A Tyopgraphic Perspective in which I compared the most influencial typographic designer of the previous three decades starting with Herb Lubalin, 70's, Neville Brody 80's and David Carson, 90's. I was a student for my bachelor's degree in the late 70's and was totally captiviated and influenced by the type design of Lubalin, hence the topic of my book. It is interesting to see how Lubalin influenced both of these designers. David Carson even referenced him in two of his monologue. He quotes Lubalin (in david.carson.recent.werk), "Sometimes you have to compromise legibiltiy to achieve impact." For insight into Lubalin's personality find a copy of U&lc that has the "The story of O"(Among Other Characters) inwhich he vows "to become the first designer to not only fill the "O" with every conceivable round graphic, but to exploit the characteristics of all the letters of the alphabet with the goal of replacing them, whenever the occasion arose, with a symbol reflecting the nature of the charater". Love Ya, Herb
Kim Morrow
2010-06-01 16:40:43


If, as CR states, there has been a movement over the last 12 months or more, towards a trend of "decorative type... so beautifully realised", why then are more and more of this country's advertising and branding agencies laying-off of the masters of this craft (in the form of their most senior practitioners – the Type and Design Directors), in favour of the Jack-of-all-trades approach, where they rely on designers with typography as just part of the skills armoury or, at best, the occasional free-lance role?

Twenty-odd years ago, every agency in town had a typography department, either as part of the creative department or within an in-house studio, backed up by a vast array of talented suppliers in the setting houses of London.

The 'desktop revolution' caused a temporary 'blip' when company executives thought the technology was best placed in the hands of secretaries (after all, they reasoned, they knew how to use this technology). Luckily, it wasn't too long before control was wrested back by the designers, but by then, a lot of bland 'Mac' work had done little to further the technologies reputation. It took about a decade to correct that.

By the time our industry wakes up to what is happening now, I feel there will be a terrible void in the talent pool that may take many years to put right.
Fat Typo
2010-06-02 10:12:56


Tell us what you think

What happens with my feedback?

We no longer require you to register and have a password in order to comment, simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before your comment appears. CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.

Share This — Social Bookmarking