CR Blog

The (No Graphic) Design Issue

Art

Posted by Patrick Burgoyne, 10 September 2006, 19:22    Permalink    Comments (1)

Here we go again. Today's Observer Magazine proudly proclaims itself to be "The Design Issue" and yet, with wearisome predictability, we search its glossy pages in vain for any acknowledgement that design can, just sometimes, be about the organisation and dissemination of information and ideas. Unless, of course, those ideas are rendered in ruinously expensive polycarbonate.

Graphic design's invisibility in the British national press long ago ceased to be a surprise. Now it's just downright rude.

The Observer's "20 page celebration" includes a profile of Jaime Hayon, a feature in which various magazine editors pick their favourite cutlery, desks and sofas and a typically entertaining reprise of the old "designer has become a dirty word" line by Stephen Bayley, in which he takes Philippe Starck to task and a chainsaw to one of the designer’s chairs. But of visual communication, we hear nothing.

Presumably, this is all intended to trail the upcoming London Design Festival, itself an almost exclusively product and furniture-based event in previous years. This time, however, Ben Evans and his team of organisers have gone out of their way to be more inclusive.

As its new strapline declares, the event now promotes “all things design”. One of the more promising of a wide array of graphics-based events this year is 1 - an Exhibition In Mono (exclusively previewed in the current CR) in which leading designers create posters in black and white in response to a single word brief. Front Page at the British Library celebrates 100 years of British newspaper design, while Pentagram partner Angus Hyland and Jamie Byng of publishers Canongate reveal “The truth behind bookjacket design” on 19 September (I have to declare an interest here as I am chairing the latter event).

The organisers of the London Design festival obviously believe, however belatedly, that there is a popular audience for graphic design. Just don’t expect to read about it in The Observer. Design Issue or not.

1 Comment

More of the media obsession with re-inventing the past. Saw a news item from the TV Conference in Edinburgh where commissioners were attempting to justify their constant trawling of 80's TV for today's new shows. Apparently, you can get more new ideas to the audience by using a familiar programme brand than by creating something new. Sounds like a cop-out to me. They mean like when 'Only Fools & Horses' becomes 'Only Fools ON Horses'. Well that might be true but who's lead the British public to such a narrow diet?
gareth_wild
2006-09-11 16:01:47


Tell us what you think

What happens with my feedback?

We no longer require you to register and have a password in order to comment, simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before your comment appears. CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.

Share This — Social Bookmarking

Get the RSS Feed