CR Blog

Modern art is rubbish

Art

Posted by Mark Sinclair, 20 January 2010, 11:19    Permalink    Comments (4)

If you have any art you don't want, or perhaps want to see that art transformed into another kind of art, then over at the South London gallery there's a giant Art Bin for your needs, courtesy of artist Michael Landy...

Landy famously disposed of all of his possessions in 2001 in his piece, Break Down, so is no stranger to creating a statement from the art of destruction.

It's also a well established artistic (or at least cathartic) process: John Baldessari cremated the majority of his early paintings in the late 1960s, only to have the ashes form part of a conceptual piece that initiated a new direction in his art.

In Landy's project, anyone can apply to dispose of an art work or two, but only those pieces accepted by him or his representative will be allowed in the Art Bin; a 600 square metre "monument to creative failure", as the artist puts it. 

Of course – there are also some fairly extensive liability clauses on the Art Bin website, just in case A Well Known Artist isn't too keen on seeing their work binned. Pieces by Gillian Wareing, Michael Craig-Martin, David Hockney and Gary Hume have apparently already made it in. 

According to the Art Bin press release, Landy's project will examine the notion of perceived and actual value, the issues of authorship and ownership, as well as the significance of our emotional attachment to art. 

From January 29 until March 14, artworks can be brought to the South London Gallery during Tuesday to Saturday (12-6pm). 

Visit the Art Bin site for more information on how to dispose of your unwanted art. The submission form is here.

Michael Landy on his Break Down project (2001) – where he dismantled and shredded everything he owned:

4 Comments

Bob and Roberta Smith did something very similar with his "Art Amnesty" project in 2002.
Maxwell
2010-01-20 17:04:16


What an idea how to dispose art.
Artist
2010-01-20 22:14:19


so he and his representatives can also decide whats not art. as well as deciding what crap is art. even in a project like this they cant leave themselves out of it. whether he and his representatives say if its art or its not, its still exactly the same thing. they still see themselves as the final adjudicators.
mark
2010-01-21 11:29:55


I agree with Mark, surely the aim of it is to make good art out of bad (or is that just the interpretation taken by CR?). So Landy decides if your work comes up to his's acceptance standard, that makes it (in his eyes) worthwhile art then? So what's the point?

It appears that Landy wants free art off other people, other well-known people to boot, so he can manipulate it into his own. Arn't there laws against that kind of thing?
John
2010-01-24 10:01:57


Tell us what you think

What happens with my feedback?

We no longer require you to register and have a password in order to comment, simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before your comment appears. CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.

Share This — Social Bookmarking

Get the RSS Feed
NULL