CR Blog

Ron Galella: Paparazzo or Artist?

Photography

Posted by Eliza Williams, 3 June 2011, 18:01    Permalink    Comments (14)

Can paparazzi photography be art? This is the question raised by two new exhibitions of work by US 'paparazzo extraordinaire' Ron Galella, which are showing as part of this year's PhotoEspaña festival in Madrid...

The shows offer an expansive look at Galella's archive, which includes images of just about every famous celebrity, musician or actress of the 1960s, 70s and 80s, the period when Galella's career was at its height. Known as a forefather of modern paparazzi photography, his collection includes famous shots of Paul Newman, Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, Marlon Brando, Elizabeth Taylor, and, most notoriously, Jackie Onassis, whom Galella pursued relentlessly for years, despite Onassis twice taking him to court for harassment.

The exhibitions at PhotoEspaña are shown across two very different venues, with each offering a different impression of Galella's 'art'. The first, at upmarket clothing store Loewe (which also sponsors both shows), is appropriately glossy. The images here capture famous figures such as Jagger and Jack Nicholson mugging for Galella's camera, suggesting a cheerful collusion between the stars and the snapper. Everyone here looks beautiful, and (almost) everyone looks happy. The exceptions to the latter are the figures who helped in building Galella's own fame: one image shows Richard Burton glowering into his lens, while another iconic shot (by another photographer) sees Marlon Brando striding forward with Galella himself in his wake, clad in a protective football helmet. Both Burton and Brando attacked Galella for his zealous pursuit of them, with Brando breaking his jaw and knocking out five of his teeth.

In the exhibition press conference, Galella, now 80, recounted such stories with glee, cheerfully proclaiming "he almost killed me!" while discussing Burton. He is clearly still enamoured by his subjects, and the personal fame that his interactions with them has brought, which culminated in last year's HBO documentary, Smash His Camera, also showing at PhotoEspaña. For Galella, a perfect shot is one that captures a star in a natural pose: "I like the surprise," he says. "Genuine expressons, real feeling, not posed pictures." Despite this, the emphasis, in the Loewe exhibition at least, is all on beauty, and Galella appears keen to show the stars looking at their best, rather than trying catch them out. It is hard to imagine him attempting the 'up skirt' snapshots that today's paps are so notorious for.

The second PhotoEspaña exhibition, at Círculo de Bellas Artes, offers a darker impression of Galella's craft, however. While he may insist that he is different to the "pack" of celebrity photographers that exist today, the beginnings of the modern paparazzi style are apparent here. Images of stars at premieres or on movie sets are combined with more intrusive pictures: Julie Christie shot barefoot and unawares in a supermarket, and Jackie O captured fleeing alone across a park. The image of Galella as the charming friend to the stars slips away, to be replaced by the (undoubtedly more accurate) idea of him as a kind of stalker.

As to the work's artistic merit, this is unclear. It is undoubtedly fascinating to view these images, both for the opportunity to peer at their famous subjects, and for Galella's sharp framing. For those interested in the history of celebrity, they give an insight into a time before heavy PR presence, and heavy plastic surgery use (although a poignant pairing of shots of Michael Jackson pre and post his first series of nosejobs foreshadows the trend for manufactured beauty that was soon to come).

Viewing such photographs in a gallery allows them an impact separate to their appearance in a newspaper or celebrity magazine; we are invited to study them, and, in turn, ponder the role of the paparazzi in our media. The passing of time also plays its part – it is particularly fascinating to view these 30-year-old images now, with all our knowledge of what happened to the famous people within them. Would an exhibition of today's stars prove as intriguing? Possibly, if it is sharply curated. Lindsay Lohan recently made an appearance in a Richard Phillips film, and Alison Jackson's staged tabloid images have an enduring appeal. Perhaps a gallery exhibition of snatched shots of Ryan Giggs or Britney Spears may not be as incongruous or unlikely as we might once have thought.

Both Ron Galella exhibitions will be on at PhotoEspaña until July 17: more info is at phe.es. A full review of the festival will appear in the July edition of Creative Review.

CR in Print

Thanks for reading the CR Blog but if you're not also reading Creative Review in print, you're missing out.

The June issue of CR features a major retrospective on BBH and a profile piece on the agency's founder, Sir John Hegarty. Plus, we have a beautiful photographic project from Jenny van Sommers, a discussion on how illustrators can maintain a long-term career, all the usual discussion and debate in Crit plus our Graduate Guide packed with advice for this year's college leavers.

If you would like to buy this issue and are based in the UK, you can search for your nearest stockist here. Based outside the UK? Simply call +44(0)207 292 3703 to find your nearest stockist. Better yet, subscribe to CR for a year here and save yourself almost 30%.

14 Comments

Undoubtedly Art. It's surprising so many stars despised him despite how beautifully he captured them...
Scotty Severe
2011-06-03 21:56:16


Paparazzi could be a certain form of Art.

Of course when it violates privacy and/or shows bad and false side of a person it is not Art at all, but just and simply a poor way of provocation and disrespect.

But I like the fact that paparazzi photos are often quick snap taking "on the run". It reveals a kind of natural and of surprise for both the viewer and the "model". It brings more authenticity.
AERTS Armel
2011-06-05 08:38:15


I too think that it is another form of art. I rarely see such cool stuff. The http://www.fineartathome.com is a good place where we can extract more such cool collection of art.
Craig
2011-06-05 12:21:04


? These are art?, or is it the icons that make these art?
as theres none of the artist in there, lets say theres no unanswered question.
They are brilliant photos.

To make something art the following might help...
It is the initial intention of the photographer that makes them art.
Even the post rationalisation that makes it art... A hidden meaning exposed in the works supporting text.
Do these photos make you question the work?
What does it do for you?
As in an emotional response.......
I really dont know its the age old question "Is it Art?"
you could just say it is Art and be done with it.

Many things are called Art a car for instance can be described as work of art, but it isnt even if it does give you a tingle :-) in the trouser department.

If it answers just one of the above then these are Art.
Cheesy
2011-06-05 19:20:04


I think looking at it now, it could be classed as art. But, the actual pictures are pretty much identical to the ones we have today. Who's to say our current media won't be classed as art 30/40 years from now. Have a look on daily mail website or any large american news site, the images of celebrities we have above are the same sort of style and situation as the ones we have today.

Still though, there is some awesome shots above. Excellent post.
Gavin
2011-06-06 10:03:10


Brilliant authentic pictures and being black & white really lifts the iconic snaps, its a shame nowadays paps get on the floor for unforgiving pantie shots outside taxi's but thats life (back then you'd lose 5 teeth and get a broken jaw). Shame im not in Madrid for this.
stu
2011-06-06 10:35:34


One function of Art is to provide a reflection or representation of the period of time it was constructed in; he does this beautifully, arguably as well as society painters did in the past.

And Art is something that changes with the time; these photographs capture the beginnings of societies obsession with celebrity; they say a lot about the world we live in today.
Abi
2011-06-07 10:46:56


I suppose your first sentence, Can paparazzi photography be art?, raises the other imponderable question, What is Art?
Clive Frost
2011-06-07 13:20:40


Lovely pictures.
Unfortunately I'm not swayed in my opinion that paparazzi are amoral, exploitative parasites.
Kim
2011-06-07 14:03:55


In a world where a photo that shows a celebrity at their worst brings in more money, this is an art form that will never be real art.
Pickle Design
2011-06-07 16:28:35


They are indeed great pictures but even sticking them in a gallery they can't really be considered art as that was never the objective for them.

One note, you mention 'Richard Prince', it's 'Richard Phillips'. It's minor, but hey I worked on it.
Andrew
2011-06-07 16:29:31


@ Andrew

Oops sorry! Have corrected now.
CR ElizaWilliams
2011-06-07 16:41:32


God, someone could jump off a bridge and land on the sidewalk and some would call it art.
jim
2011-06-07 20:00:24


Theses particular shots were not art then and they are not now now. What they are is a story of a guy trying to make a few bucks. Its what people wanted to see and Galella fulfilled that need and he was good at what he did. Same today, if there was no audience for such material then there would be no suppliers.

However, what these pictures have become is what we should maybe think about. Some of theses subjects are no longer with us and we look with renewed interest trying to gain some insight into what they were really like. Of course we can never really know but this is maybe the closest we can get.

Social documentary, history recorded, certainly! but art? never!

Peter
Peter Bolton
2011-06-19 09:22:19


Tell us what you think

What happens with my feedback?

We no longer require you to register and have a password in order to comment, simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before your comment appears. CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.

Share This — Social Bookmarking

Get the RSS Feed
NULL