CR Blog

News and views on visual communications from the writers of Creative Review

A Leopard That Can Change Its Spots?

Patrick 26/10/07, 10:16

stacks.jpg
Apple’s new Leopard desktop

As I write this, Apple’s Mac OSX Leopard is nine hours from launch. The new operating system bulges with new features, many of them superfluous, others that will, in the terminology of these things, no doubt be considered “neat”. But if you were hoping that it would LOOK any better, you will be sorely disappointed. Leopard is even shinier, even more bevelled, even more everything than its predecessor. Surely it’s time that Apple offered us some more tasteful alternatives?

leopard_stacks1.jpg

It’s been a good few months for Apple. In figures for the last quarter released last Monday, the company posted revenues of £3bn and looks set to have tripled its sales in five years. And, despite all the talk of iPhones and iPods, Apple’s computers were the star performers, selling 2.16 million units - more than in any other quarter in its history (although, to put this in perspective, Hewlett Packard sold 13 million machines).

leopard_stacks2.jpg

leopard_stacks3.jpg
Desktop icons from Leopard

It’s long been a cause for concern among designers that Jonathan Ive’s exteriors are not matched by what appears once the machines are switched on - it’s like having a brilliant architect build you a house, then filling it with World of Leather furniture. Sure it works well, but does it have to look so bad? As Apple becomes more popular (driven by the iPod and iPhone) so it becomes more populist in the look and feel of its interface. Designers will have to face up to this - they may have stuck by Apple in the lean times but, in the big scheme of things, they are going to become a less important constituency. But in the meantime, and in today’s web 2.0 spirit of customisation and openness, what about giving the user more control over how their machine looks?

I’m writing this post in Wordpress. It will appear on our blog which looks the way it does thanks to a skin which our designer has placed over the Wordpress skeleton below. All Wordpress blogs are essentially the same underneath but all can look different thanks to this “skinning”. Couldn’t we do the same with Macs?

To avoid design anarchy, Apple could enlist some of the world’s best designers to create a range of approved skins for the interface. Perhaps you would choose the Peter Saville - looks beautiful, but you wouldn’t be able to get it to do much before 3pm. Or the Dieter Rams - at least the calculator would look better.

Or maybe there could just be a set of styles to choose from:

1, The Modernist
The desktop is divided into a strict Crouwel-ian grid: anything saved on it will be arranged in neat, exactly-spaced columns. All text in Helvetica. Only three colours - black, white and red. All icons rendered in simple line drawings.

2, The Smile In The Mind
For those who like a little more humour in the workplace, each icon will make use of a witty visual pun. In tribute to the master, all text rendered in a font created out of Alan Fletcher’s hand-lettering.

3, The Wallpaper Reader
Desktop by Vitra. Wastebasket - a Brabantia pedal bin. iTunes symbol - a Bang & Olufsen Beocenter.

4, The Nostalgic
Today’s functionality rendered in yesterday’s styling - a return to Susan Kare’s masterpiece.

Alternatively, just let Jonathan Ive do it.

Comments(18 comments)

yes quite dissapointing and really corporate. I wish your ideas (esp. first two!) would be possible to come to life from some kind of hack or skinning on the OS.
:)

Posted by oberdone on 26/10/07, 10:38 am

just received leopard and i think once you use it for a while you will like it more… we have to wait till the full advantages come to life as it is up to coders, but i have been finding new hand features every minute!

Posted by Jamie Parsons on 26/10/07, 11:11 am

You wouldn’t be complaining about the look of OSX if like me your company forced you to work on a bloody PC. I have to switch on my iMac every night and use OSX a bit just to make myself feel better!

Posted by Dave P on 26/10/07, 11:30 am

Apparently the problem with Leopard’s new desktop interface is more than skin deep… http://furbo.org/2007/07/03/the-hig-still-matters-even-with-special-effects/

Posted by Michael (Boicozine) on 26/10/07, 11:43 am

There’s always been Mac Themes, or you can use the likes of candybar to change them:

http://www.panic.com/candybar/

like this

http://showngo.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/dock-icons-my-macs/

Many of the new os features are just getting it closer and closer to the original Next unix machines osx is based on. Huge icons etc.,

The icon mirror effect is particularly hideous. But shininess is not limited to the OS. Jonathan Ive has a lot to answer for when it comes to the new super shiny screens on imac’s that so many people are complaining about.

Posted by steve on 26/10/07, 12:31 pm

“There’s always been Mac Themes, or you can use the likes of candybar to change them:”

I know, but I’m talking about making it part of the OS - official, Apple approved skins that won’t give your IT department a fit of the vapours if you use them

Posted by Patrick on 26/10/07, 12:35 pm

True. I guess its a classic case of “well we don’t have to make 32 bit icons anymore, and we’re gonna show it!” hence blends, bevels, filters, shadows, transparency etc.,

Posted by steve on 26/10/07, 12:56 pm

The question I ask myself, is what will our Macs look like in 10 years, and what else will we be doing on them?

I can chart my career through the Mac OS. I started on a Mac Classic. Everything was in B&W and I had to save work on a floppy disk. To think! I was fairly bowled over by the fact that I could draw squares and circles on screen and print them out.

But anyway… I am kinda looking forward to staring at a new interface since I spend so much time in front of these machines now.

Posted by Marcus Taylor on 26/10/07, 1:03 pm

What a condescending and reviling discourse. You literally complain about the interface look being too popular!
Let’s face it, design is not about make things more usable or more easy to understand. It is all about ELITISM, it is all about luxury for self considered intellectuals.
If you don’t like the way the Mac looks you could have created skins for it (there have been easy editing tools for all systems since a decade ago) but you didn’t because “those things” wouldn’t look good in your portfolio… too nerdy. And you wouldn’t sell it because you will never upload the skin in a website and let everyone download it for 20€… too cheap and too popular.
Peter Saville? Susan Kare? Helvetica and only three colors? Let me say that I am thrilled that elite designers like the ones you mention will never rule the world and keep doing expensive stuff for themselves and their friends.
I am relief that I don’t have to work everyday with something envisioned by an artist. I want to work with something designed by a designer and I want to admire the artist’s work from the distance. I want to live design and look at art, not the other way around.
If Peter Saville is so damn good (as a designer) why didn’t he make any piece of useful desing? because he’s an artist, not a designer.
The designers you talk about DON’T MAKE THINGS THAT WORK (and never will). They produce post-industrial luxury for post-industrial liberal commercial artists craving for the appropriate luxury that fits their liberal mind set (me and you whether you like it or not).
If Susan Kare was so damn good why she didn’t make anything else after her Apple experience? BECAUSE SHE IS NOT GOOD AT ALL, SHE JUST HAPPENED TO BE AT THE RIGHT PLACE DURING THE RIGHT TIME.
You don’t like the contemporary mac interface because it is popular, you don’t like it because it’s easy to understand and easy to grasp and finally, you don’t like it because it is spectacular. Being spectacular is the perfect recipe for a Spiderman2, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars fan to love it and you will never be in the same room with such a person, too ordinary for you.
The designer and the common people, theoretically they go together but we all know DESIGNER DOESN’T MEAN DESIGN. Designer means elitist art produced in a middy mass fashion.
I am sure I am being too honest to be a perfect target so why don’t you stop bragging so gratuitously about the taste of the mass and start working on a skin for the mac? No, you won’t make a thing and you will keep “designing” crap for designers. You will never lose you aura, not for 20€ posted on a website and can be copied.
Prove me wrong.

Posted by Daniel Robert on 27/10/07, 2:24 am

i use a PC at work, and i like using themes. the fact that such a thing doesnt exist on OSX is laughable. but then again, so is the wet floor.

Posted by jon on 27/10/07, 9:40 pm

With all respect to your input onto this site, Patrick, this article is simply a load of rubbish. It’s basically Top Gear talk. Rather than debating the purpose and performance of the tool, you sweat endlessly over the look and coolness of it. Is there nothing else for you to worry about, or is this the only chink in the armour you can find?

This sort of chit chat only serves to fuel the fire in the bellies of the design world’s many Veruca Salts.

Please don’t turn this blog into another compulsive tripe factory, Blogger’s Diarrhoea is very contagious, and up to now you guys seem to have been taking your medicine.

Posted by Gavin on 27/10/07, 10:53 pm

Daniel, I agree totally. Why would you enlist the talents of the dinosaur design bourgeois to style an interface that excels (yet occasionally fails to deliver). These people aren’t interface designers and I doubt would have any grasp on what makes an interface function and work. Artists and designers differ, if you want Saville to make something look ‘better’ unleash him on Windows. It’s also case of if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Posted by Clem on 28/10/07, 2:44 am

When Susan Kare designed the original Mac icons she was a trained illustrator with no previous experience of interface design - I think she did a pretty good job. I concede that look and feel is relatively trivial when compared to having a machine that actually works, but it’s part of the overall experience of ownership. Ive understands that, but why doesn’t the interface match up to the standards he has set on the outside?

Posted by Patrick on 28/10/07, 2:04 pm

I think it’s not all that bad but I must admit the first thing I did was go look on the web if I could find a way to lose the 3D effect of the dock, the bevel on the close buttons and the transparancy of the finder at the top.
I must say I really like the darker tone of grey they use now so I think if they would just mix some of the old with the new it would be perfect.

Posted by Not Another Graphic Designer on 29/10/07, 8:19 am

There is so much additional functionality in the OS and software features nowadays that the icons need to work harder to express themselves. That said, there is alot of gloss and kinetic pzzazz for sure. Its the 3D flavour that upsets some in the design culture. The majority of [consumers] I think would really like it.

Posted by David on 29/10/07, 12:02 pm

OK, now that I have installed Leopard on my laptop I have to say, I can’t stand the new dock (way too busy - yuck!) and the transparent menu just doesn’t match the rest of my interface when using multiple palettes (like Photoshop). (It matters to me, OK?)

There are hacks for killing the dock and killing the transparent menu, but I have to say I am little disappointed with the interface. However, one day on there are some great new features in there.

Not sure if I am ready to install it on my desktop machine though…

Posted by Marcus Taylor on 30/10/07, 3:10 pm

Graphic*
User**
Interface*** - how should it look?

It should be
***usable,
**ergonomic and it definitely can
*look good.

All those shiny effects can exist (and you should be able to witch them off) but that shouldn’t decrease usability. Like this mega shiny iMac screen - did they test it at all?

Definitely the decisions about GUI shouldn’t be made by artists or masses (and I’m not saying their input doesn’t matter). Imagine you were in Barcelona and the wayshowing signs were “designed by Picasso” - looks cool, but would it work?

Here is very insightful review of Leopard.

Posted by AL on 30/10/07, 6:46 pm

Why can’t the dock be transparent, the opaque white design is quite annoying!

Posted by Sqwink on 06/11/07, 2:45 am

Post a comment

We no longer require you to register and have a password in order to comment, simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before your comment appears. CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.







Categories
Launch the Images of the Week Player
Categories

Sponsored links