Three Trees Don’t Make a Forest

3Trees
Left to right: Caroline Clark of lovelyasatree.com, Nat Hunter of Airside and Sophie Thomas of design studio thomas.matthews who have come together to form Three Trees Don’t Make A Forest

“We have high ambitions: the entire creative industry needs to be shaken up and sorted out,” says Sophie Thomas, one third of newly formed social enterprise, Three Trees Don’t Make A Forest (who feature in our January issue, out now). The new initiative, which launches this month, aims to provide a one-stop-shop for creatives seeking information on sustainability issues and how their working life affects the environment.

Thomas, co-director of design studio thomas.matthews, has teamed up with Nat Hunter of Airside and Caroline Clark of ecologically-aware design site, lovelyasatree.com, to form Three Trees. “We’ve all been on the same circuit talking about sustainable design and have noticed there’s a real thirst for practical information on how it relates to communication design,” says Thomas. “As Three Trees, we intend to run workshops for students and small studios, offer consulting and also go into large corporations to talk to their in-house teams. One of the first things we’re doing will be a D&AD workshop next year.”

Three Trees functions alongside the two designers’ full-time studio work and Clark’s established online resource–the hope being that the new venture will quickly become a place for creatives to discover how to make projects more environmentally sound, source particular paper or ink suppliers, or even (as Hunter has already succeeded in doing with her own team at Airside) get advice on how to run a design studio in a much more sustainable way.

“I’ve been interested in these kinds of issues for 20 years but hadn’t seen a way to bring it into my business,” says Hunter. “Over the last two or three years I’ve seen more and more ways to change the running of the studio and, when I met Caroline and Sophie earlier this year, we realised how valuable a resource that could disseminate all this information to creatives would be. We need to get this out there and I know how easy it is to change what we do.”

Huge
The members of Three Trees have much experience in dealing with issues of sustainability within their
own practices. Airside, for example, worked on animations for Live Earth (still from A Beginner’s
Guide to Giving a Damn about Climate Change shown)

The trio wear their own ecological credentials on their respective sleeves. From the outset the working philosophy at thomas.matthews has placed issues of sustainability at its core. Airside, on the other hand, are relative newcomers to this way of thinking, thus Hunter offers a fresher, top-down perspective that balances Thomas and Clark’s experience of sustainable design from the word go. The trio also admit that being included in CR’s very own “green” issue back in April this year helped to strengthen their cause to work together as a team.

But while each has experience of a range of environmentally-aware initiatives, doesn’t any serious change require the design industry to rethink its practices on a more holistic level? “A lot of people think that the whole issue is just to do with paper, but there’s, of course, a lot more to designing in a sustainable way,” adds Clark. “When people are working on something, they’ll think about making one object look beautiful and how it might then look in their portfolio– they don’t necessarily think about the 50,000 others that might be sat in the warehouse.”

Lovely site
Caroline Clark’s website, lovelyasatree.com, remains a valuable resource in helping designers make
more environmentally friendly choices in their work

Another issue that Three Trees hope to challenge is the clichéd idea of the green aesthetic. The point being that deciding to be a greener designer is more than simply creating work that ‘looks’ environmentally-friendly. “We want to transcend the aesthetics of sustainable design,” says Hunter. “At the moment, if something is ‘sustainable’, it has to look like it is. Our point is that ‘everything’ should be sustainable, it shouldn’t just look like it might be.”

To date, Three Trees is a tight collaborative effort between its three founders, but they hope to set in motion the means to create a network of people driven to promote sustainable design. “It’s a very collective concept,” says Thomas. “It’s going to be about collaboration and people connecting from lots of different areas. Effectively, we could all be in competition with each other – Airside and thomas.matthews are for-profit companies, so we’re trying to set a precedent really. We’re saying you can have a business, be sustainable and also create really good design.”

Three Trees Don’t Make A Forest has just launched its new website and will be running D&AD workshops on 31 January and 14 February. More details at dandad.org soon

Comments...

This sounds really interesting, would definitely want to attend the D&AD workshop.

James Kirkup
07/Jan/08, 5:31 pm

The real green must happen at the government level, you know, with real laws. It can’t happen at the user level because not being green is still cheaper hence, it’s impossible to be green unless you use it as a new trick in your already full bag of tricks to look super elitist, postmodern, overeducated and really really contra-cultural… pfff, stupid designers.
Honestly, the only thing that graphic design can give to companies and the damned “green movement” is the looks. The looks to appear green which now serves to make the consumer spend what he doesn’t have and not feel guilty. Huge crap.
Ladies, if you planed this to make money; it is a good idea, you can make a lot of money varnishing old identities and doing PR. However, if you really mean the green thing I have to say that your idea is doomed to failure and you are very naive and superficial. It may look cool to design students but, listen to me, it is STUPID and NAIVE.

Dani Robert
08/Jan/08, 2:02 pm

Well I was very happy when I found http://www.lovelyasatree.com, I’ve used it to spec print jobs, which as a result have reduced environmental impact.

Tools (such as lovelyasatree.com) can help bring closer a time when designing without being suitably responsible is simply indefensible.

Joseph Hole
08/Jan/08, 3:04 pm

its a tiny thing.. but please can you forever ban the term ‘one-stop-shop’. its just so horrible, it actually hurts my eyes when I read it.

other than that, good luck to the trees people.

Rich
08/Jan/08, 5:05 pm

Dani.
Real Green, as you call it, can only really happen if it is tackled at every level. Your comment would suggest that you do not acknowledge your own responsibility and you sit back and wait for government to tell you what to do. Come on, even George Bush now recognises that climate change is happening and is a catastrophe caused by human activity. NASA climate scientists say we have approximately 100 months before we reach ‘tipping point’- the point where our actions have caused irreversible consequences. I trust the words of this ‘damned green movement’ more than yours and this fact alone should demand you to get of your high horse and roll up your sleeves. Shutting our eyes and doing business as usual will not reduce our carbon emissions by the government’s target of 60%, let alone 90% by 2050 as the IPCC now believe is needed- and where better to start than the carbon intensive business we work in.
Change must done by all – government, business and individual. It means losing the cynicism and seeing the opportunities. As someone who has run a design studio for ten years using these principles it has always made perfect business sense to me and honestly, you just can’t use the ‘more expensive’ argument anymore in this context because it’s just not true.
Do you really believe that change can’t happen at the user level? If 60% of the UK’s CO2 emissions are directly related to our consumption levels then here is an area primed for change. Designers are not devoid of blame and Three Trees has not been established to show designers how to do guilt free work. In my eyes designers need to empower themselves with useful tools and knowledge in order to change inaccurate perceptions, like yours, about the power of the individual and the strength of the industry collective. Designers must become the agents of change because this catastrophe demands us to re-think the way we live and re-design society as we know it.
We are nothing to do with tricks. For us it’s about action, innovation and collaboration and if that’s contra-cultural, then I am all for it.

Sophie Thomas, one of the trees
10/Jan/08, 12:33 am

Dani

Further to Sophie’s comment, I’d like to say that you’ve got a very shallow view of what graphic design is about. Graphic designers these days don’t just create aesthetically pleasing brochures, they are involved in exhibition design, interior architecture, moving image, digital design, product design and packaging. They can work with the client to redefine the brief, source the materials, decide where things are manufactured, how they are manufactured, how long the life cycle is likely to be, and what will happen to the product at the end of the life cycle. The environmental impact of the product must be considered at each of these stages, and Three Trees has been set up to give designers the tools to do just that.

Nat Hunter
10/Jan/08, 11:01 am

Guys, do you really believe that human beings are going to buy the most expensive product, use less energy and consume less gods just because is the right thing?
No change is possible if “not changing anything” if more profitable.
Read some economics and then tell me that trusting people to do the right and less profitable thing is the right way to go.

Dani Robert
10/Jan/08, 12:41 pm

On the subject of green and design.
I came across this new Lexus add in Monocle magazine. It’s for the new LS 600h L. This is from the same company that makes the Prius, Toyota.
The LS 600h L is a hybrid car as well and is sold to the customer as a green product with the power of an ordinary luxury car. The title reads: “One day lower emission will come with higher performance.*”
The small print speaks about fuel consumption of 8.0L/100km and even 11.3L/100km urban traffic. The CO2 emission of 219g/km makes this is not a green car at all. EU regulations tell us emission will have to drop to 120g/100km in the future for car manufacturers.

My point?
Isn’t it about time designers and advertising agencies start telling people the truth about products instead of just selling a product?
Isn’t it about time we think about the environmental impact before creating a leaflet with a 2second lifespan once in the hands of “the consumer”?

Not Another Graphic Designer
10/Jan/08, 4:41 pm

In response to Dani’s comments on 10/01/08:

First of all, it’s not necessarily more profitable to ‘not change anything’ as you say. For instance, printing companies who have taken steps to minimise their environmental impacts have reported lower running costs. They also have a competitive sales advantage over printers who’ve done nothing.

Secondly, to not make environmental improvements will ultimately hurt the bottom line as consumers are now demanding that companies take these issues on board.

caroline clark
16/Jan/08, 12:10 am

Post a comment

We no longer require you to register and have a password in order to comment, simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before your comment appears. CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.

POST

Also from CR Blog...

Launch the Images of the Week Player
Subscribe to CR Blog

via RSSRSS Feed


Sponsored links

Code by Twelvenoon