Brand purpose has come in for some criticism recently. Nick Asbury wrote a fantastic article for CR asking ‘is this the end of brand purpose?’, citing campaigns of varying degrees of clunkiness from Pepsi, Heineken, Dove and McDonalds as the final nails in the coffin. Patrick Burgoyne followed it up with an evisceration of a new Cadbury’s campaign that attempts to convince consumers of its philanthropic ideology.
The key word here is ‘campaign’. I believe that brand purpose is more fundamental than it has ever been. But if it’s conceived as a communications campaign, it isn’t a purpose in any meaningful sense. And people are likely to see right through it.
Join our community
This article is available to subscribers only. Sign up now for your access-all-areas pass.
If your email address is registered we will send you an email to recover your password.
Got a question?
+44 (0)20 7292 3703 or firstname.lastname@example.org