Advertising sold us products to help us deal with climate change, but failed to understand its role in creating the problem in the first place.
Because by being production-heavy or CO2-intensive or non-reusable or non-recyclable, many of the products that agencies promote have an irrefutably negative effect on the environment. Put starkly, when an ad sells one of these products, it advances a company’s profitability, but harms the prospects of humanity. Which brings us to an extremely inconvenient truth for my industry: that such products shouldn’t be allowed to advertise.
If, as it brutally states on the front of a fag packet, SMOKING KILLS, then surely OIL KILLS, FAST FASHION KILLS, MEAT KILLS, SINGLE-USE PLASTIC KILLS, MINERAL WATER KILLS, IMPORTED AVOCADOS KILL, DRIVING KILLS and FLYING KILLS?
Join our community
This article is available only to subscribers. You can join here.
CR's premium content is available only to subscribers. Join today for the sharpest opinion, analysis and advice on life in the creative industries.
+44 (0)2072923703 or firstname.lastname@example.org