The Aeron Chair: Office Design Icon

The Aeron chair – a triumph of empiricism over aestheticism? No design studio is complete without one: Daniel West traces its history

Aeron chair
The Aeron chair – a triumph of empiricism over aestheticism?

No design studio is complete without one: Daniel West traces the history of the Aeron chair

Office chairs are seriously dangerous writes Daniel West. Super­ficially they seem benign; flimsy levers and autistic wheels hardly warrant an FBI Most Wanted entry. But this blandness is illusory. Their pathetic construction is the cancer of workplace health and safety – a silent epidemic of negligence that is ruining livelihoods everywhere.

The problem is shockingly common and shockingly simple. Take America. Every workday, 40 million white collar workers use office chairs, yet the design principles behind most of those chairs are fundamentally flawed. Mass-market furniture is aimed at the middle ground: a set of generalised physical para­meters that supposedly encompasses 95 per cent of the population. That means two million Americans every day are sat in the wrong chair; equal to the employees at General Motors, PepsiCo, Ford, ibm, and General Electric combined. On top of this, another eight million are estimated to have maladjusted chairs, meaning 10 million people a day risk workplace injury in the US alone. To some eyes that’s unprecedented corporate abuse…

This ongoing scandal inspired a design classic. The Aeron chair, released in 1994 by Herman Miller, was an ugly miracle grounded in empiricism. “It came to signify a new paradigm in office chairs,” says Paola Antonelli, the curator who brought the Aeron into moma’s permanent collection. This new paradigm was inclusive design. Designers Bill Stumpf and Don Chadwick began with the anthropometric data common to all office chairs. The ‘95 per cent’ dogma dictated they aim for the median at the expense of the periphery. Instead, Stumpf and Chadwick recognised they were not designing one chair, but three.

Aeron chair exploded
Build your own? Not a chance… look how many parts there are…

Previous designers had sought a holy grail of universality, a chair that would fit all bodies irrespective of shape or weight. “One chair to fit all sizes would have been a horrible compromise, but using three sizes we could serve a much wider demographic,” says Chadwick. The concept was old – shoes, suits, beds – its application to office chairs revolutionary.Differentiated chairs had been used in schooling for years. A 1940s study of Australian schoolchildren found that, even among kids in the same year, variation in body size warranted six different-sized chairs.

But the office furniture sector was driven by profit, not benevolence. Chairs broke down into two blunt categories: executive and budget. A few thousand pounds bought a walnut-veneered, calf skin-covered boardroom throne; stools would do for the staff. This plutocracy had a particularly chauvinistic twist: most secretaries are female, most women are smaller than men, thus female secretaries not only sat on cheaper chairs, but chairs that were designed for larger-bodied men.

It was a fact not lost on Chadwick. “Female secretaries sat in terribly uncomfortable chairs, but sat in them longer than their superiors,” he says. “The philosophy behind Aeron was democratic: the person who sits longest deserves the most comfortable chair.” It is certainly arguable just how democratic a $1,100 chair can be, but the Aeron’s launch price was mid-market nevertheless.

The innovation didn’t stop at sizing; the Aeron’s materials and form were ground­breaking too. Rather than beginning with a sketch or a fabric swatch, Stumpf and Chadwick committed themselves to whatever substances and shapes were best suited to the task – not an easy choice for two aesthetes. In place of spongy foam lozenges they developed a supportive plastic weave that allowed air to circulate to the back and thighs while sitting.

This material, named Pellicle, was also more environmentally friendly than traditional solutions as less of it was required. The Aeron’s forgiving waterfall lip, high back and arm rests afforded flexibility to the sitter, presenting numerous body positions that were both healthy and relaxing. This was orthopaedic coercion in the gentlest sense, not a brittle Victorian straightjacket of ‘perfect’ posture. It’s a result that recalls Charles Eames’ point that chairs should be designed for how people sit rather than how they should sit. Herman Miller called it topographical neutrality.

Aeron chair: Marc Justus
What the…? It’s the Comandare Chair (prototype) by Marc Justus. Apparently the design,
based on the Aeron, is more appropriate to today’s digital generation (ie it reclines)

The Aeron was refined and progressive, but no chair is perfect. Much adjustment ‘functionality’ owed more to patented gimmickry than essential customisability. Herman Miller has reams of online docu­ments about how to maximise the Aeron’s potential with arm angling, tilt limiting and PostureFit™. Should a supposed design classic be this complex? “The adjustments on the chair were due to the brief,” admits Chadwick, “History has shown that a lot just aren’t used.” So the Aeron conforms to the old 70/30 design conundrum: the average customer will only use 30 per cent of total functionality. Despite this, the Aeron’s unique Goldilocks triplication ensures that less adjustment is necessary.

The Aeron’s true value wasn’t its texture, shape or sizing. It was a triumph for empiricism over aestheticism, proof that beauty is illusory in the case of tools. Because that’s what a work chair is: a tool to keep you comfortable, safe and supported – not seduced. “The Aeron doesn’t have a pretty face, but like an intelligent mind it projects beauty,” says Chadwick. Mies van der Rohe once remarked that it was easier to design a skyscraper than a good chair. In the World Trade Center lobby – the most posthumously iconic of all corporate spaces – Aerons were the chair of choice.

Yet ironically, the Aeron may be best remembered as shorthand for the dotcom years; internet start-ups were filled with them. Its legacy outlived their failure though. The chair is still selling in showrooms worldwide and even online, in Second Life. 

More details on the history and development of the Aeron chair available at

This feature appeared in our interiors supplement that came with the last issue of Creative Review. Daniel West is a writer and curator,

You may also like

Q Do You Think You R?

T-shirt featuring a QR code. Snap it with a internet-enabled camera phone and be taken to
the wearer’s website of choice
Quick Response Codes (those square pixellated barcodes that, when scanned by a camera phone, bring up information or link to a particular website) have moved into the world of bespoke fashion. Emma Cott, a Munich-based clothing label has launched a new collection of t-shirts enabling users of social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace to take their profiles to the street, sporting an abstract code design on their chest. Visitors to can generate their own QR code (that links directly to the website of their choosing) and add it to their choice of t-shirt. It’s self-promotion made very simple.

Roll Up For The Great Design Auction

Is a Brody worth more than a Sagmeister? Will a Hyland hold its value better than a Carter? Find out on 9 April when over 100 lots from 64 designers go under the hammer of “distinguished rebel auctioneer” Jonathan Barnbrook at The Design Auction.

Design Conferences: Isn’t it time we demanded more? asks Rick Poynor

For anyone who loves going to design conferences, we live in remarkable times (writes RICK POYNOR). There are dozens, if not hundreds, of them. A design conference always seems to be just starting or finishing somewhere in the world. It would be quite possible to make going to conferences into a full-time job and some of the more in-demand and tireless design conference speakers appear to be doing just that. When do they get their real work done, you might wonder? The answer is that they do a lot of their thinking in transit, at 30,000 feet, or in the away-from-it-all, vacation atmosphere of distant hotel rooms paid for by conference organisers who are thrilled they are willing to appear.

The Strange Art of Misery Lit

Borders bookshop has a “Real Lives” section. Waterstones ups the ante with “Painful Lives”. Amazon’s catch-all is the more enigmatic “True Endurance and Survival”. But earlier this week I found myself in the “Tragic Life Stories” aisle of WHSmiths. After taking in that, yes, a whole section of shelving had actually been given over to this subject, it struck me that while each book pertained to be a traumatic tale of an individual, they were marketed in such a way as to look entirely the same. Unlike the covers within the nearby Crime section, where even the most conventional might feature a gun, a knife, or something vaguely noir-ish; within Tragic Life Stories there is, apparently, no need to differentiate details. Each one is a tragic tale; each one has the same cover: a child’s face and a scrawled, handwritten title.


Client Manager


Senior Designer

Crown Growing Brand Belief